最高相似度示例 · 非人工确认结果
目标片段但是当这个老先生跟我描绘了有线电视的时代，广播的时代和报纸的时代，具体情况其实也没有好到哪里去的时候，让我意识到了我的这种义愤填膺。很多时候，它来自于不光光来自于我的见识短浅，不光光来自于我的言情，而是因为我对于人类，我对于政治抱有着过高的理想式的期待。我期待政治演讲可以是一群真正关心民生的文明的声势，在那里，礼貌地跟彼此讲话。但是这是一种不靠谱的期待。如果我认为一个有活力的能够代表各路利益的民主政治相互抗争的民主政治是一个健康的社会的话，
来源片段And this has impoverished public discourse in ways that I think a great many people find frustrating. So nobody who's trained in political philosophy as ours by you and others can hear a distinction and resist the urge to introduce further distinctions. So let me put a few distinctions to you. So one distinction is the one that I briefly just invoked between two different readings of the principle of merit. On one reading or principle of merit, it is simply that when there are positions of advantage in society, they should go to the people who best merit them.
查看片段位置
5 个展示片段 · 共 6 个展示片段（含上方示例）— 点击展开
S1：2 个窗口回退
来源片段
And so I think we need to ask ourselves, why is it the case that over the past four decades, elites have come to look down on those left behind? So to what extent is this about economic policy and to what extent is this about cultural attitudes? Because I'm quite sympathetic to the importance of economic explanations in the rise of populism. I think there's a strand of, especially American political science that wants to write that off completely and say it's all about culture and all about race, particularly. And I'm not quite convinced by that evidence, but there is a problem for those of us who want to believe in economic roots of populism, which is that a lot of the populists, not
目标片段
他需要的不光光是技巧和内容，他也需要一种艺术，我们管他叫做修辞的艺术rethric讲话的艺术rethric这个词在英文中其实是有一点贬义的感觉，它是一个贬义词。我觉得老百姓总是会带着一种狐疑的眼光去看这种所谓说话的艺术，或者说修辞的艺术。但是另外一方面，每一个好的政治家，人类历史上所有的伟大的演讲，他背后肯定不全，都是真情流露，他需要的一定是一种艺术。所以说什么样的政治演讲才是好的政治演讲。为什么有一些政治演讲，他可以在历史上永存。比如说帕特克Henry在1775年点亮美国革命之火的那个演讲不自由误宁词，对吧？
来源片段
on those less fortunate than themselves. You describe the emphasis on credentials and the emphasis on look how I deserve my exalted position in society, because didn't I work hard in high school and didn't I get into a great school and didn't I get a good GPA and so on as sort of last acceptable prejudice. I mean, you're teaching at Harvard, you taught me at Harvard, you're around the rising elite all of the time. And you know, unfortunately I see in the nature of these things, a lot of the people who listen to this conversation, a lot of the people who listen to this podcast, probably in a broad
目标片段
当然广阔也一定意味着嘈杂的乱七八糟的声音会变多。我们可以听到更多哗众取宠的质量差的声音，同时也意味着质量好的声音不会被淹没，它会有更多的机会进入到人民群众的视野中。哇， 我听他讲完这个历史视角之后，我觉得从我的视角来说，我有点醍醐灌顶。因为成长在社交媒体时代的年轻人，我一直习惯抱怨社交媒体和智能手机给我造成了回音室，让我看到的都是一些我早就同意的言论，或者说让一些非常恶臭的声音，有机会在网上大放厥词，这个政客只想哗众取宠。
S2：2 个窗口回退
来源片段
There are the people who are determined to interpret the chaos and make it fit their favourite theory, their white album theory, their political theory, their moral theory. And then there are the entrepreneurs of chaos, the people who are simply making something out of it. And there is one odd moment in the essay that stands out because it's... I want to say because it's incongruous, but the point of this essay is everything in it is incongruous. Everything is meant to jar with everything else, but even within that context, there's something a bit odd about this moment. Again, it's described without much comment as just an example of what it was like to be alive in California
目标片段
他需要的不光光是技巧和内容，他也需要一种艺术，我们管他叫做修辞的艺术rethric讲话的艺术rethric这个词在英文中其实是有一点贬义的感觉，它是一个贬义词。我觉得老百姓总是会带着一种狐疑的眼光去看这种所谓说话的艺术，或者说修辞的艺术。但是另外一方面，每一个好的政治家，人类历史上所有的伟大的演讲，他背后肯定不全，都是真情流露，他需要的一定是一种艺术。所以说什么样的政治演讲才是好的政治演讲。为什么有一些政治演讲，他可以在历史上永存。比如说帕特克Henry在1775年点亮美国革命之火的那个演讲不自由误宁词，对吧？
来源片段
I know what the, actually what the moral is here. I feel like I know what the payoff is. I should say, I'm completely wrong. But I felt, oh, almost this is going to be that cliche, which is the writer is being diagnosed as mad. But actually, the moral we're meant to take from this is that the writer is perfectly sane. The sane response to this period and to these experiences is to think that the intellectual structures collapse and none of it makes sense. And that what we're going to be told at the end of this essay is that it wasn't Didion who was mad.
目标片段
而抓住人的注意力是说服他们的起点，你不能够无视这些有效的规则，真正在历史上成功的伟大政治演讲，都是在遵守了这些规则的基础上，或者说理解了这些规则的基础上，然后选择在这个规则中填充自己的血肉播客的。最后我想用一个故事来结尾，我觉得这个故事完美的总结了，为什么很多时候不安适适的年轻人通过自己的观察力，发现社会上一些让他们觉得很失望的现象。因此，对身边这个现实世界产生了一种愤世忌俗的态度，觉得这一切都糟透了，觉得我们这个时代在下降，在变得腐败，但是很多时候时间经历和阅历，反而可以让人变得更加平和，而不是让人变得更加愤世忌俗。
来源片段
I mean, his best friend is a guy called Len Billings, who actually was gay and had a crush on Jack Kennedy. But people like Len Billings, they don't think he's just a spoiled daddy's boy. They think of him as a person who, you know, will sit up late at night over, you know, the one glass because he's not a big drinker, you know, or over a cigar, talking about what is the role of government in a world competing between democracy and communism. And he's interested, isn't he, both in ideas and in talking to people. And that seems so important for successful politicians to have that combination.
目标片段
他认为里根之所以能够让美国人如痴如醉，就是因为他的演讲方式。昨天我跟这个撰稿人老先生聊天的时候，我就提到了这个问题。我说里根为什么能够通过他的演讲方式，让他成为如此受人欢迎的总统呢？我觉得当时我在这个首席战略师写的这本书，还有这个老先生里面都都听到了一个共同的观点，那就是里根对于听众感情的运用，其中很重要的一个方式是他的幽默。这两个人都提到了里根可能是美国近代所有总统中使用幽默最出神入化的一个总统，能够在不冒犯的情况下，