来源节目
证据摘要
证据等级部分相似
接受窗口5
覆盖率5.5%(5 / 91 段)
查看算法层细节
相似度中位数0.668
最高相似度0.694
时间信息exact / exact
如何阅读先选来源,再选片段比较:上方为目标,下方为来源灰色方块:目标片段彩色方块:来源片段(颜色对应来源播客)实线:对齐片段对(颜色对应来源)线条透明度随相似度变化;最不透明的线条表示最强匹配

最高相似度示例 · 非人工确认结果

目标片段我自己个人最愿意听的那些哲学播客,就是最忠于思想家本身的播客。主播不光需要有足够的智慧去理解,并且消化这些哲学家的意思,而且需要完全不带偏见的把他们重新组装反除给我们吃,他可以帮助我很快的用粗略的、不完善的方式来快速了解一些我可能平时并不是很熟悉的思想家在某一个事情上的观点。当然我觉得这个标准已经对于这个主播的学素素质素质要有非常高的要求,并且排除了绝大多数市面上的一些水平不是很高,
来源片段No amount of dialogue will make the truth more obvious to someone who is unwise, who doesn't have a grasp of the logos, nor will it give any additional insight or information to the wise for whom the truth is already obvious. This is all too obscure. I think it's helpful to consider Nietzsche's later criticisms of the great philosophers, his criticisms of Kant, Schopenhauer, Spinoza, Plato, and so on. Insofar as he doesn't deny their intelligence or the fact that they had a great ability for using reason and that they genuinely seem to hold a faith in the idea of reason, helping man to determine what is true.

相似度 0.694 · The Nietzsche Podcast · 31: Creators and Self-Legislators (III: The Philosopher) · 目标 2:58–3:31 · 来源 14:25–15:03

查看片段位置
4 个展示片段 · 共 5 个展示片段(含上方示例)— 点击展开
  1. S1:2 个窗口回退
    1. S1来源 3:44–4:19目标 2:42–3:160.672

      来源片段

      It's not just. . . We have a better understanding of what it is that the philosopher does. And the philosopher of the future, they'll be self legislators and creators. And it's in those terms that Nietzsche explains himself. It's what he's doing in the Spokesar of Thistra, right? And what all philosophers of the future must do if they wish to truly fulfill the great task of philosophy and help to elevate mankind, not by themselves providing the blueprint of how man should live, which is perhaps the way he thought about it in his early career, but by creating new values, which is the way that Nietzsche begins to think about the philosopher in his later work.

      目标片段

      这个主播最好不要给我添加他自己个人的见解,他最好可以呈现这个哲学家最接近原貌的这个哲学家,本人的思想框架。我自己个人最愿意听的那些哲学播客,就是最忠于思想家本身的播客。主播不光需要有足够的智慧去理解,并且消化这些哲学家的意思,而且需要完全不带偏见的把他们重新组装反除给我们吃,他可以帮助我很快的用粗略的、不完善的方式来快速了解一些我可能平时并不是很熟悉的思想家在某一个事情上的观点。

    2. S1来源 16:42–17:17目标 3:44–4:160.651

      来源片段

      But the other side of that coin is that because they pursue their will to power in the abstract form as the will to truth, the philosopher is typically not an example of someone who acts effectively or powerfully in the physical world. The philosopher is powerful only in the abstract realm of the intellect. So that tells us something. In the essay show up in our educator, which I've based this whole little three part series on, the philosopher is originally grouped together mostly with the artist in that essay.

      目标片段

      对于这个哲学家的了解,可能自己都似懂非懂的唠科型的哲学播客。这些播客做的很多事情,并不是老老实实的去诠释这个哲学家思想体系本身,而是更像是一个青年的臆想,或者是停留在大众大众成存面已经存在的对这些哲学家的理解,然后不知道从哪里随便搞了一本学者写的对这个哲学家的评述。

  2. S1来源 21:06–21:18目标 17:55–18:150.636

    来源片段

    That's the way in which his philosophy served life and was life affirming because virtue, you know, virtue is about how one acts in the world. And that's what all of his philosophy is aimed at.

    目标片段

    所以哲学之所以是一个关乎我生死的事情。就是因为每一个哲学体系在他经历过我的个人理解、消化判断之后,他的真假与否适合我本人要用什么态度去面对这个世界,

  3. S1来源 40:58–41:30目标 20:44–21:150.663

    来源片段

    Quote, Gradually, it has become clear to me what every great philosophy so far has been. Namely, the personal confession of its author, and a kind of involuntary and unconscious memoir. Also that the moral or immoral intentions in every philosophy constituted the real germ of life from which the whole plant has grown. Indeed, if one would explain how the abstrusest metaphysical claims of a philosopher really came about, it is always well and wise to ask first, at what morality does all this aim?

    目标片段

    但是与之相反,在我的个人世界里,对于我对于我自己来说,所有的思想体系,所有的我理解的哲学家说的每一句话,经过我的阅读消化,它已经变成了我是谁的一部分。每一个思想,我对它的态度一定是充满偏见的,而且一定是在经历过我自己的人生经历这一块三棱镜折射之后反射出来的哲学思考,它一定会不满了。我的个人特色,而不再带有在大学讲堂上的那种学者的严谨性。