最高相似度示例 · 非人工确认结果
目标片段他在很多西方年轻人心中激起的，反而是一种自豪的生命力。对于高贵的渴望，对于古典美德的狂者，这是为什么西方极端右翼会被尼采吸引？这是上一期播客的内容，尼采并不是单一的拒绝了哲学真理，他是在失忆的生命力上拒绝了哲学真理。但是我们也可以说，这种生命力也是一种哲学。在他心中真正的哲学是有生命力的。哲学。尼采不是在单一的批判，现代社会在批判实用主义在批判因果哲学，他也提供了另外一种可能性。
来源片段more indicative of the actual tone. But it's in this essay that Nietzsche recognizes Rousseau's philosophy as a viable channel for the will to power, although he wouldn't have found quite a phrasing like that at this time in his work. The will to power is an idea he comes up with later, but the reason is because Rousseau is a philosophical current of malcontent with the modern world and with civilization. He's untimely. The romanticism of Rousseau leads him to an idealization of nature and several naive assumptions of there being natural freedom and a natural justice, which Nietzsche would always have
查看片段位置
3 个展示片段 · 共 4 个展示片段（含上方示例）— 点击展开
S1：3 个窗口回退
来源片段
of both men that the collective morality is an imposition on the individual, that the collective has shaped the individual over generations, and sort of attacked the natural and healthy instincts in favor of what is necessary for living in a collective, that the promises of the Enlightenment, of progressing toward a more perfect society are folly because every advancement is a trade-off. Both men in some sense reject the modern world and turn their gaze backward then as a point of contrast with the modern world. The essay, Schopenhauer as Educator, Nietzsche offers us the least negative assessment of
目标片段
他们通过宣扬尼采的这种反普世的权力意志来反对马克思的科学共产主义，他们开始着手批评，任何就是宣扬普遍性真理，宣扬客观价值，宣扬想要把社会往更好、更美好的方向推进推向进步的这种思想，这是一群重新激活尼采的法国新左翼。他们不相信进步，他们不相信普世价值。他们不相信启蒙。他们不相信真理，一切都是建构的，他们放弃了真理他们手中挥舞的这个思想上的上方宝剑，就是尼采的权力意志。
来源片段
the promises of the Enlightenment, of progressing toward a more perfect society are folly because every advancement is a trade-off. Both men in some sense reject the modern world and turn their gaze backward then as a point of contrast with the modern world. The essay, Schopenhauer as Educator, Nietzsche offers us the least negative assessment of Rousseau that he ever gives. I don't, I could say most positive, but I think phrasing it as a double negative is more indicative of the actual tone.
目标片段
虽然说尼采也在谈论非常严肃的问题，但是尼采也知道这些严肃的问题，谈论本身可能是荒诞的，人性的愚昧，没有办法得到纠正，是否能够进步。在尼采思想中是模棱两可的。我们可以说这是一种非常古典的态度，就是人性的荒诞，我们无法从世间剔除。但是后现代主义西方的这群新左翼，他们把尼采的这种模棱两可上升到了一种形而上学的层面，他完全的从形而上学上。我说的是西方的新左翼拒绝了这种进步的可能性。尼采之所以可以在西方被拿来用作跟鲁迅完全相反的用途就是反对启蒙，反对进步。
来源片段
as the golden age and the desire to return to the garden has appeared throughout the canons of Western literature since then. Nietzsche rejects Rousseau's view of the state of nature, importantly. He argues that a terrestrial paradise is not found at the gate of every culture. He writes in Birth of Tragedy that, quote, only a romantic age could believe this. Where we encounter the naive in art, we should recognize the highest effect of Appalachian culture, which always must first overthrow an empire of titans and slave monsters, and which must have triumphed over an abysmal and
目标片段
尼采积极的那一方面的误解，才是尼采吸引西方极端右翼分子的地方。所以咱们能说这种20世纪的左派文学家鲁迅 冰星 玉达夫对于尼采的误解是完全没有意义的吗？No虽然说他们在因为一些难以避免的局限性，没有办法从西方人的视角去了解基督教或者说神的空间。在西方现代的瓦解，苏格拉底对于哲学真理的追求，以及一整个西方思想传统的建立。那我想听到这里的所有观众肯定会同意我的态度，就是我们去品鉴。当时的文学作品，不光光是为了品鉴，他们想要表达的意义。