来源节目
证据摘要
证据等级部分相似
接受窗口5
覆盖率3.4%(5 / 146 段)
查看算法层细节
相似度中位数0.706
最高相似度0.723
时间信息exact / exact
如何阅读先选来源,再选片段比较:上方为目标,下方为来源灰色方块:目标片段彩色方块:来源片段(颜色对应来源播客)实线:对齐片段对(颜色对应来源)线条透明度随相似度变化;最不透明的线条表示最强匹配

最高相似度示例 · 非人工确认结果

目标片段当然,这也解释了为什么最轻蔑知识分子的人,往往都不是贵族商人普通的劳动者,他们不在乎,而是其他知识分子,其他群体未必会对知识分子产生如此强烈的情绪,因为他们不共享同一种虚荣和竞争。我觉得知识分子之间彼此厌妇并不是一件坏事。因为他们之间共享的是那个不服从的姿态,就是让自己的生活和语言和判断带有某种例外性。也正因为如此,我说知识分子永远是下流的,他们不属于上流社会,不属于中产秩序,不属于民众,他们在所有的阶级之间流动借力寄生反叛、
来源片段so confused and naive. Look at them all battling it out for their culture to be the universal way of looking at things. But not me. I get it. All these people are fighting, but all of them are actually equal. They're all condemned to battle against each other in a world where I at least realized the truth that nothing is in fact universal. So I guess maybe they should all just learn to get along better. But do you see what they just did there? They just made a universal out of there not being a universal. As Gizek says, this post patriarchal nihilistic type of subjectivity generally sees the world as mass chaos, mass difference. Everything about reality is

相似度 0.723 · Philosophize This! · Episode #200 ... The Postmodern subject and "ideology without ideology" (Zizek, Byung Chul Han, Marx) · 目标 34:59–35:30 · 来源 16:56–17:30

查看片段位置
4 个展示片段 · 共 5 个展示片段(含上方示例)— 点击展开
  1. S1:4 个窗口回退
    1. S1来源 3:14–3:47目标 11:13–11:450.717

      来源片段

      wise. But again, what really happens is that this effectively cuts people off from the depth of the real problems we face as people and they end up living at this surface level feeling very wise without any of the depth of experience that true wisdom requires. People do this with morality to they'll say there's a common sense thing that it is to be good, for example, never tell a lie. You know, it's not complicated. Just treat people nicely out there. It's simple as that. And then again, when they do this, it just ends up preventing people from engaging with the world at a deeper level, which is something we need people to be doing right now. Because the G check as we've seen

      目标片段

      这个现实即包括了此时此刻的现实,也包括了历史中的现实,拒绝承认现实,或者说对于现实摆出的唯一姿态是道德上的义愤填膺。在我看来是一种幼稚吗?但是这不代表我们去承认现实,不代表我们要给现实提供正当性,对吧?它可能并不具备正当性,认清事实,并不意味着给事实提供正当性。我想说的仅仅是自古以来上流社会都追求知识分子。除去。我刚才一直在说的这个主要原因就是知识是罕见的。而上流社会会追求一切罕见的东西。

    2. S1来源 4:26–5:02目标 22:28–23:000.664

      来源片段

      something. Why would somebody need that common sense simplified take on something as complicated as morality, for example, we have to ask how might having this universal benefit this person ideologically? More than that, we have to wonder, even if their intentions are good in writing it, how is this common sense universal going to be used by other people in potentially bad ways? The job of a philosopher to G check is not to collect common sense or to create fixed universals about the way that things are. It's to question common sense. And if we have to create universals to engage with them constantly, it's to acknowledge reality as that ideological construct made of

      目标片段

      雅典青年的那个看起来有点猥琐的苏格拉底,他们不需要去表达个人才华经营,个人民生不需要依附于大众的喜好,不需要依附于贵族的趣味,他变成了一种职业。那么既然是一种职业,他需要开始代表一种在黑格尔笔下,他需要开始代表一种公共的、普遍的、理性的现代的知识秩序,我觉得可能没有人想听我讲黑格尔的法哲学原理,但我们需要稍微进入到黑格尔的体系里,就是在法哲学原理这本书。黑格尔理解现代国家的时候,做出了一个很关键的区分。

    3. S1来源 9:28–10:00目标 27:54–28:300.706

      来源片段

      letting ourselves down and not doing the work of a philosopher if we didn't critique this newer postmodern way of thinking that's been on the rise for the last few decades, where the result of this way of thinking reliably leads to a type of identity in a person where they feel as though their existence is revolutionary when it's not that they're more free than most of the human beings that have ever lived on this planet, and that they're morally superior to the people around them, all while hiding behind a false depiction of their own humility. That is going to be something Zizek says that we see all over the place in the modern world and all sorts of different kinds of people. It's fascinating actually for

      目标片段

      知识分子不再只是站在城邦之外颠沛流离、批评城邦的人,而是以一种合法的身份进入到了城邦内部,在国家和社会之间承担解释教育和保存理性的功能,你牺牲了自由,你获得了安全这种命运,难道不就是一整个现代性的体现吗?当然,这种安排的好处是显而易见的,他给知识生活带来了前所未有的稳定性,乃至于现代学术体系内,你看看有多少人对于这种稳定性,在最近几年的松动,天天搁那鬼哭狼嚎,不知所措。

    4. S1来源 14:28–15:01目标 31:29–32:010.664

      来源片段

      meditating. And he says, Finally, finally, I've been meditating every day for two years in my life. And I finally got into the place where I've transcended my own ego. I now realize how much my ego is just an illusion. And look at all these morons around me that are never going to get on my level, trapped inside of their little monkey minds over there. This is a great visual example of the kind of inner dialogue that dominates postmodern thought. It's an extreme example for a reason. Of course, I realize this isn't what everybody's thinking when they meditate. But if you consider how popular meditation

      目标片段

      思想同时也需要某种不安的张力,这是现代大学的悖论,他保护了知识生活,但是他让知识生活失去了他自古以来的精神强度。当然他确实在过去一百多年里面非常成功的有史以来最成功的为相当大数量的一批知识分子提供了庇护OK.我想说最后一个观察,最后一个观察,我下面这句话不带任何价值判断。我知道下流这个词可能听起来是一个贬义词,但是我没有再用道德判断来使用下流这个词,我在使用一个隐喻,