来源节目
证据摘要
证据等级部分相似
接受窗口4
覆盖率1.6%(4 / 251 段)
查看算法层细节
相似度中位数0.687
最高相似度0.707
时间信息exact / exact
如何阅读先选来源,再选片段比较:上方为目标,下方为来源灰色方块:目标片段彩色方块:来源片段(颜色对应来源播客)实线:对齐片段对(颜色对应来源)线条透明度随相似度变化;最不透明的线条表示最强匹配

最高相似度示例 · 非人工确认结果

目标片段并没有很好的扎实的理由,导致他这些词语的存在。这些概念的存在,影响了我们现在的思考方式。对啊, 你不觉得这还是一个很有现实意的话题吗?因为这些确实对于现实的社会政治,包括大家怎么去理解这些概念,比如说自由权利这些概念有很大的一个影响,对吧?对啊, 然后我就说这就为什么我把我朋友拉上我的播客的时候,大家会说你太无聊了,没有人想听,然后我就给这个话题起了一个更加滑重取宠的影子和开头。
来源片段and stuff like that, extreme emotional responses. It works and that's how they get the people to stay. I haven't used social media that much, so I'm not by any means an expert on it, but this is what I'm reading about. Yeah, well, and so with all that being said, going back to what you're talking about with social isolation, I think could you make an argument that a lot of the uses of AI then are going to be pretty unhealthy? Because if AI is your first girlfriend and it's still,

相似度 0.707 · The Nietzsche Podcast · Untimely Reflections #25 - William Kaiser: AI Optimism · 目标 1:13–1:48 · 来源 42:57–43:30

查看片段位置
3 个展示片段 · 共 4 个展示片段(含上方示例)— 点击展开
  1. S1:3 个窗口回退
    1. S1来源 61:56–62:33目标 7:12–7:460.682

      来源片段

      by including specific parameters that you want it to address. And it's almost to me, and this is going to be, you know, huge in the workplace, the use of AI, it almost makes sense to me to say, I think there could be a college major in the future of how to interact with AI, that it's that significant of how you basically inquire to the database. And I'm seeing that, I'm seeing that I can get better

      目标片段

      而且这个时候其实AI如果说你用的好话,可以帮助人去做一个校准。就我记得我有一位在统计大学之前读博士的朋友,他就在他的人工翻译,完了之后,他就把每一段话去喂给deep seek,还是chat gpt,反正就喂给AI.然后请AI来看说这段话,你对比一下原文,你觉得我这边哪里是不是有非常明显的明确的重大的错误。然后确实根据它的反馈,那AI是可以帮它指出一些它自己没有看到的错误的那这个当然就是会提升它的这个翻译的质量,对吧?

    2. S1来源 67:44–68:16目标 9:44–10:160.654

      来源片段

      before I can make that decision. But in terms of AI text for writing and writing well, I think it will be indistinguishable. What are the ethics then in that world? Like if somebody were to misrepresent AI generated writing as their own. I don't think it's a black and white question like that because it's more like if you're a writer working within the field or even a creative writer, you are going to be using AI

      目标片段

      他是一个人做出的判断,他不是AI做出的判断。AI没有能力,也没有资格,他就没有任何立场去判断,说我们要怎么说。远上寒山石近习对这个其实是他AI本身的逻辑导致的。AI本身的逻辑导致的那大家可能也清楚AI的一个逻辑,就是他是根据你给他的上一个字或者上一句话来判断说他下一个字或者下一句话,在最大概率上应该是一个什么,他可能选择了一个最大概率的字,然后给你输出。

    3. S1来源 69:43–70:17目标 60:29–61:010.691

      来源片段

      that watermarks be used but it's not clear how realistic that is and should distinguish between the AI generated versus the non AI generated. Yeah, well, and my sense of it is that, so my feeling, my intuition is, yeah, that's dishonest and I would never do that. And I have no interest in doing that. On the other hand, it is interesting that it was a collage artist who sort of was being called out for doing this because it's like what they already do

      目标片段

      那这才是思想僵化的最恐怖的体现。而反思这些议法的合理的这样一个方式。其实这个工作是由学者来做的。对OK我们其实我觉得说到这里再去扯到那个肤浅的问题,有点搞笑,就是这个东西就是没有办法被AI来做的。我心里不是不是在苟言残喘地说,哈哈哈哈来看吧。AI取代不了我的工作。我在这里说的仅仅是这个东西,对于人类来说有意义。