最高相似度示例 · 非人工确认结果
目标片段所以我的第一个真正的观点是，任何一个在互联网上以为自己了解他人的人，了解我的人，你其实也不了解我，对吧？我想说第一点是在互联网上建立起来的。所谓的了解也是一种幻觉。而且对于这个时代的年轻人来说，他正在摧毁他们在现实生活中建立真实的、有意义的、复杂的人际关系的能力。因为互联网上没有共识。我想说，第二点是不同的社交媒体平台会有不同的用户倾向，因此也带来不同的气质。这是一个没有争议的事实。
来源片段it's actually about who is shouting loudest using these new forms of communication. And in a way, you could say the people who are the biggest problem are the people who are in their own minds the best informed because they probably aren't as well-informed as they think they are, but also thinking that you're well-informed creates a kind of stridentcy and intolerance. And I'm not saying this is just true of the people who have gone online, discovered that there is a vast conspiracy and concluded that they now know the real
查看片段位置
2 个展示片段 · 共 3 个展示片段（含上方示例）— 点击展开
S1：2 个窗口回退
来源片段
ways the most intolerant on the remain side. And part of what happened was a reaction against those people and their sense of well-informed entitlement. This is a long-winded way of saying, I'm a little wary of thinking that the biggest problem that we have is that our voters lack the information. I would focus much more on what happens when they express their views, preferences, emotions, whatever it is, how that then is turned into information through the political system because democracies are like markets, they are information processing mechanisms.
目标片段
绝大多数用户都没有关心到会去发出任何声音，发表自己的任何意见。但这些平台的气质是被最激进的用户塑造的。我们下面讨论政治。每一个平台在政治上也有不同倾向。我的观察是那些以女性用户为主的平台，会在政治上形成一套相当稳固的道德倾向。这种道德倾向的通常表达方式是谴责和纠正以男性为主的平台，也会形成一套相当稳固的道德倾向。这种道德倾向的表达方式是系统化的黑化，对于外界来说完全无法戳破的认知体系。
来源片段
those generations they express. Dislike in some cases, contempt for each other. But as a way of grouping people politically, it feels a little thin as a solution to this relative to the other ways in which people might be grouped. And the most conventional one is geographical by constituency, by area. So I'm not sure if you did it like that, it would look anything other than pretty contrived. And I'm also wary of weighted voting. For some of the reasons that David was saying before, in an ideal world, if you were designing these systems from scratch, there are lots of things you might do and people might think, well, that's fine. I understand the reasoning.
目标片段
他们日常生活场景中能够接触到的，比如说游戏场景或者是通俗小说中的概念来进行扩张。建构出一个看似也是逻辑自洽的体系，以供自己进行毫无节制的自我庆祝，这是逻辑的暴政。这是一个一直以来自诩自己会思考标榜，自己会批判性思考的人。那些人之所以会变得比现实生活中不爱思考，但是活在现实中的人更加愚蠢的倾向。我认为这是一个自然的知识倾向。所以你要是去彻底放弃它，就意味着你很难进行思辨和讨论。