来源节目
证据摘要
证据等级部分相似
接受窗口4
覆盖率3.0%(4 / 134 段)
查看算法层细节
相似度中位数0.664
最高相似度0.716
时间信息exact / exact
如何阅读先选来源,再选片段比较:上方为目标,下方为来源灰色方块:目标片段彩色方块:来源片段(颜色对应来源播客)实线:对齐片段对(颜色对应来源)线条透明度随相似度变化;最不透明的线条表示最强匹配

最高相似度示例 · 非人工确认结果

目标片段在他所生活的18世纪中旬的法国,他认为,败坏的道德摧毁了社会性的情感恶法,横行有关政治原则的错误,理解泛滥危险的学说肆虐。在这样的一个社会,他要如何思考卢梭和启蒙派哲学家的决裂,并不意味着他要拥抱宗教派,或者说他回到了保守派,他指出的只是一个让启蒙哲学家也感到有点难堪的事实,那就是宗教保守派的不宽容是真的,他们会迫害对手是真的。但是,启蒙哲学家代表的并不是普世真理,他们代表的只是有利于启蒙哲学派的真理,他们也会迫害对手达伦贝尔所代表的百科全书派也曾经试图借助政府的力量来扼杀反对者。
来源片段think he's a bad person who consciously wanted to bring forth fascism. Even though Kantian rational morality is just as much of a part of a dialectic that brings about fascism as Nietzsche's morality or critique of morality is their point here is that Nietzsche's doctrines when realized reveal their truth and refute themselves. So to the extent that Nietzsche positions himself as struggling against the modern world struggling against totalizing rationality, he both truthfully critiques this zeitgeist. And in the final analysis ends up recapitulating to it,

相似度 0.716 · The Nietzsche Podcast · 118: Max Horkheimer & Theodore Adorno - Dialectic of Enlightenment, Part 2 · 目标 31:44–32:19 · 来源 96:56–97:31

查看片段位置
3 个展示片段 · 共 4 个展示片段(含上方示例)— 点击展开
  1. S1:3 个窗口回退
    1. S1来源 55:40–56:17目标 3:29–4:000.671

      来源片段

      the falseness of any system's myths or any culture's myths, or the distance between the ideal and the reality in any political system or church institution or whatever it might be. And so Nietzsche believed that Europe had come to this exact point. And in Nietzsche's work, he attributes this to Kant and Schopenhauer, but particularly Kant, who critiqued and ultimately delimited the boundaries of reason's domain. This is the eventual fate of all theoretical approaches to life, when reason divides its limits, when it recognizes that it can't solve everything or account for

      目标片段

      上帝的存在灵魂是否不朽爱国、友谊、良心以及婚姻的神圣。他认为,哲学与思想生活摧毁了一个社会最优秀的那个部分,也就是维系这个社会的信念。因此,他对科学与艺术的这般指责,似乎要求实行最彻底的政治审查。听到这里,你还觉得他是一个左派吗?卢梭提出这些观点的时候,他不惜与当时法国一整个启蒙主义最著名的哲学家决裂达伦贝尔狄德罗。

    2. S1来源 58:42–59:21目标 26:58–27:310.658

      来源片段

      dissolve all of the myths and move on to a quote unquote purely rational society, which in a way is like a betrayal of the principles of the enlightenment because all individuals are done away with and become statistical and all this, all of these things. Or you could, the enlightenment might undo itself by producing that romantic reaction. It might produce that reaction that says no, the nihilism of that approach is so bad that we're going to throw away all of the potential benefits or the ways that the enlightenment advanced mankind and throw all that away and undo the enlightenment the other way. I mean, really, the key point or

      目标片段

      哲学训练容易把人带向两端,要么远离公共生活冷漠厌世的独处沉思,要么鄙视那些不懂哲学的人。久而久之,哲学是一种反国家、反社会的习惯。第二类人知识分子,哪怕知识分子算是就是哲学家往下那一类的人,对吧?他们消耗的是哲学家生产出来的这些思想成果。卢梭认为,哪怕哲学家本人很谨慎,他们也会被那些更加不谨慎,也更加不聪明的文人知识分子,而模仿戴着理性中立的面具。

    3. S1来源 83:14–83:49目标 27:14–27:450.656

      来源片段

      in a way, both are honest exponents of enlightenment. Perhaps that's the way in which Nietzsche can be called the supreme exponent of the mind of enlightenment. Everyone becomes a quantity that is repeatable and replaceable, something to be used sort of the rationality of utility, and therefore in a society with this great contradiction between those who have power and those who don't, this ideology manifests as almost a kind of like pure domination. And Nietzsche, far from being an irrationalist, from this reading actually reveals a purely rational way of living

      目标片段

      第二类人知识分子,哪怕知识分子算是就是哲学家往下那一类的人,对吧?他们消耗的是哲学家生产出来的这些思想成果。卢梭认为,哪怕哲学家本人很谨慎,他们也会被那些更加不谨慎,也更加不聪明的文人知识分子,而模仿戴着理性中立的面具。一群人把反对多数意见,当做身份标签,传播着一些为了让自己在这个圈层里面显得高明显得特别的观点。