最高相似度示例 · 非人工确认结果
目标片段为什么要抽象化？因为你要是不抽象化的话，这个日子是过不下去的对吧？你要是不去在具体的物质上再施加一个抽象的东西。那具体的不同的物就会导致所有的语言和逻辑无法进行。因为逻辑就是建立在这种对于具体物品的抽象化之上，我能够说奶牛猫和梨花猫都是猫，而不是两个完全不同的长着毛的，在挪动的生物，我把它总结成了一个猫，实际上它们两个是完全不同的具体的存在，对吧？
来源片段and how we could think about deducing that certain things were true. Let me explain. Let's say we're trying to classify some unknown reptile that we just found. If all snakes are carnivorous reptiles that don't have legs, and we just found a carnivorous reptile that has legs, then if those two things are true, no matter what, this reptile cannot be a snake. Now, another example could be if all birds have wings, and this animal we just found doesn't have wings, then this animal is not a bird. So as you can imagine, as Aristotle's classifying all these
查看片段位置
2 个展示片段 · 共 3 个展示片段（含上方示例）— 点击展开
S1：2 个窗口回退
来源片段
To start off, I think the most common little historical factoid that people think of when they hear the name Aristotle is that he was the teacher and friend of Alexander the Great. Yes, Aristotle did teach Alexander the Great for a short period of time. Now most people hear this and they get some overly romanticized view of it. Plutarch, a Roman historian years later, said that Aristotle taught Alexander the Great all kinds of things like ethics, politics, medicine, natural philosophy, poetry, but no matter how brilliant of a teacher Aristotle was or how
目标片段
在小宇宙上听过我的六元赋菲丹集第210期笛卡尔哲学有什么政治意义和第130期亚历斯多德为何认为政治是所有学科的女皇的朋友们，也可以在接下来的讨论中听得出来。基于这两个人的哲学体系之上延伸出来的，我延伸出来的两种完全不同的广义上，是古代人和现代人对待做饭的态度。第一点我想说的是你从笛卡尔哲学第一成思路的哲学核心体系里的最关键的一个关键词和亚历斯多德在政治学、伦理学里最关键的一个关键词。
来源片段
universal properties between all these various examples of things in the natural world. The difference was how they arrived at that knowledge. And it was a pretty big difference. I mean, much of the evolution of Plato's thought in his later works, including his complete departure from his level of conviction regarding his world of forms and what exactly it is, a lot of this can be attributed to the questions and counter arguments of Plato's student Aristotle. And how about the fact that Aristotle was Plato's student? I mean, it's one thing if two people don't see eye to eye
目标片段
基于这两个人的哲学体系之上延伸出来的，我延伸出来的两种完全不同的广义上，是古代人和现代人对待做饭的态度。第一点我想说的是你从笛卡尔哲学第一成思路的哲学核心体系里的最关键的一个关键词和亚历斯多德在政治学、伦理学里最关键的一个关键词。从这两个关键词出发，其实就能看出两种截然不同对待做饭这一活动整体上态度的不同。换句话说，其实我说的是他们的起点是两套完全不同的认知论如何。从这两个截然不同的出发点到达不同的对于做饭的认知epistemeOK是哪两种认知？