最高相似度示例 · 非人工确认结果
目标片段我自己平时家中也会常备在我嗓子不舒服的时候，感冒生病的时候，来两颗关键时刻真的很有用。首先我的第一个想法，你可以说是对那种善心大发，想要反问我说你为什么要杀身，为什么要吃肉？你既然这么尊重鸡，你为什么还要吃鸡的人是对这种想法的一个回应，那就是人和鸡一样。人生和鸡生一样，最终的目的只不过是死，而其所与其耗费终生苦苦追求长生不老。我觉得更有意义的思考是什么？
来源片段Really, I have no idea if there's an answer here, seriously. What I wanna do is illustrate the games that we play in our heads. How easy it is to keep two sets of books when it comes to these moral criterias that we have. And I wanna do it in an interesting context. So this conversation is a good one. Let's talk about the common arguments that people give when they try to justify why killing animals for food is an okay thing to do. Firstly, maybe a good place to start is to make it clear that we're not just talking about whether it's right or wrong to kill animals at all. We're talking about killing animals to meet our caloric needs.
查看片段位置
3 个展示片段 · 共 4 个展示片段（含上方示例）— 点击展开
S1：3 个窗口回退
来源片段
And yeah, you can mess with team cow or team chicken, but you never do anything that would kill someone on team human. Now, the reason this is a hard position to defend is that the onus is on them here. The onus is on the person using this criteria to explain why, although there is clearly a hierarchy that extends across every being in nature to them, why that hierarchy magically ends where the human species begins and ends. As though we're not all points on an evolutionary continuum that are constantly changing. It begs the question, do these people really believe
目标片段
但是在日常英语中，这个词也被用来描绘人类社会等级制度。你在日常英语对话的时候说Packing Order其实你说的是人与人之间、社会、人类社会的等级制度和权力结构。而那些生活在野外的走地基会建立非常稳定的灼毛秩序，如何建立通过你死我活的打架来建立通过内部战斗短暂确认地位之后，就不会再持续攻击。当然鸡群之间的和平是建立在一个稳固秩序之上的这不是建立在什么鸡鸡相互平等、相互尊重的同情形之上，
来源片段
I don't break the rules when it comes to eating other animals. Look around you, stop being so naive. It is an inexorable fact of the universe that life eats life. Lions eat gazelles, cats eat mice. How come lions get to do it? But I can't. To pretend as though there's some different standard for us is in itself in other form of human arrogance. Look what you're doing. Well, someone arguing against that might say, what makes something a moral choice at all is the idea that there was some other thing you could have done besides the thing that you did. We, as humans, have the ability to reason.
目标片段
所以我在讨论当时那期播客做鸡如何帮我反思现代性的时候有人问我，他说一只晾鸡溜着小步，吃着古物过着有尊严的生活，你去把这个有尊严的生命吃掉你的同情心在哪里？你为什么不去同情这个鸡，你的人道关怀在哪里？我会说我在人文主义教育是什么？这期播客里讨论过人文主义和人道主义的区别。人道主义是一种毫无节制的，没有纪律的同情，这是不自然的普世标准。人道主义的不自然体现在他们已经无法接受自然中存在，一定的确实需要去尽量克制，但是无法消解的大自然的残忍。
来源片段
To pretend as though there's some different standard for us is in itself in other form of human arrogance. Look what you're doing. Well, someone arguing against that might say, what makes something a moral choice at all is the idea that there was some other thing you could have done besides the thing that you did. We, as humans, have the ability to reason. We have the ability to weigh the pros and cons of an action, to choose which one we think the best one is, and to act on it. The lion, on the other hand, just sees a gazelle and eats it. It's operating based on instinct.
目标片段
我觉得这种鼓吹完全不需要获得外界认定的价值观。在很多时候，那些在网上表演自己如何做自己的人，也是在通过这种方式获得外界认可吗？你没有办法逃离天性中渴望被认可的社会性，那些鼓吹自己能够完全不在乎他人认可，只要做自己的人，几乎在所有的情况下，在我看来都是一种捂着耳朵、自欺欺人。我觉得有一种更好的态度，可能是我们需要去理解并且调整什么样的认可，是我们值得争取的爱，我们的人，值得尊敬的榜样的认可。