来源节目
证据摘要
证据等级部分相似
接受窗口5
覆盖率3.2%(5 / 154 段)
查看算法层细节
相似度中位数0.679
最高相似度0.707
时间信息exact / exact
如何阅读先选来源,再选片段比较:上方为目标,下方为来源灰色方块:目标片段彩色方块:来源片段(颜色对应来源播客)实线:对齐片段对(颜色对应来源)线条透明度随相似度变化;最不透明的线条表示最强匹配

最高相似度示例 · 非人工确认结果

目标片段但是这个边界它又不完全是被社会习俗而决定的,总是有一些不变的接近人性的自然因素来划定这些边界。我也相信一个真正自由的社会,是一个每一个成员都可以去享受并且积极的使用它所拥有的这份自由的社会。这就需要作为一个社会啊,我想它要不停的去反思在一个比较高的层面,不停的去反思关于自由边界的讨论越激烈,越生机勃勃。参与这个讨论的成员,他对于自由的定义越具体,我觉得这个社会就是越自由了。一个看似拥有无边无际自由的。
来源片段The Republican is the person who says that the fundamental value is, or I've already said it, is freedom. And what it is to be able to live freely in a civil association. So the fundamental value is freedom. And what you have to understand to understand Republicanism is its view of freedom. So there's a bit of Skinner. And I mean, as he makes abundantly clear, freedom is the value for Republicanism. And this gets it into an even deeper bind with this, because not only is freedom intrinsically valuable, but it really is the only thing that's intrinsically valuable.

相似度 0.707 · Political Philosophy · MACHIAVELLI 2 Resistance Freedom · 目标 4:23–5:03 · 来源 11:21–12:01

查看片段位置
4 个展示片段 · 共 5 个展示片段(含上方示例)— 点击展开
  1. S1来源 12:13–12:25目标 11:38–11:520.644

    来源片段

    And it means what it says that really this is a morally consequentialist view, by the way. But the consequence that we're trying to maximize is freedom in the sense of non domination.

    目标片段

    这个不算是在严格意义上行,使我的言论自由。我想说的意思呢就是言论自由,它里面包含的这个言和论,其实隐藏着我们对于理性的要求。

  2. S1:3 个窗口回退
    1. S1来源 18:59–19:33目标 25:14–25:460.697

      来源片段

      I'm not necessarily best placed to say what sorts of social relations, say, you know, a black trans woman, is absolutely in her best interest. That's for them to put forward and really articulate. It doesn't mean I have to agree with them on everything. If they say the earth is flat, I'm allowed to voice skepticism. But actually, in general, in terms of the sort of social respect and dignity that many excluded groups are asking for, it might be my place to listen first. And so in which case, we do want to hold on to this idea that there is a will of the people. There is a collective expression of the common good. And Trump isn't like just a blip on the way to that or a quirk of our electoral system.

      目标片段

      美国社会越来越容忍一切人表达一切观点,它维护所有人的表达自由,而不再不再拥护这种言论的自由,这是他们对于价值序列的放弃,这是对于真理的追求的放弃,这是对于理性的放弃,这是一种虚无主义。我说这句话的意思不是说这个社会只有一个正确的理性的观点。就像我刚才举的那个例子一样,就是那个怎么样的社会应该是最好的社会的例子一样,我觉得可以有很多相互碰撞的相对正确的观点同时存在进行彼此的挑战。

    2. S1来源 43:24–44:00目标 26:58–27:300.670

      来源片段

      So we, you know, freedom is a valued achievement, fairness is a valued achievement. If we say that something is fair, we're accrediting an action with a positive appraisal. It can also be disvalued, so unfairness. And there can also be concepts that have a sort of moral ambiguity to them. So think of power or the political as essentially contestable concepts. These can both be positive and negative, depending on the understanding and the circumstance. But essentially, contestable concepts are evaluative terms, they signify value or lack of value.

      目标片段

      因为我们肯定不能容忍每一种观点同时存在,在社会上肯定是要进行一些筛选的筛选的方式有两种。第一种是通过理性的探讨,去探索,去碰撞,哪个观点,更接近真相,更有逻辑性,它的它更优越。但是因为美国重新把言论自由定义成了表达自由,它放弃了这种筛选方式。所以因为表达是没有高下之分的,但是言论是可以有高下之分的那美国大法官放弃了这个标准之后,

    3. S1来源 70:58–71:33目标 28:58–29:300.666

      来源片段

      It might be shocking today. Let me try and translate this into modern parlance. In modern parlance, I might say something like this. Many have condemned so much of what's happened in American history. We look back and we see the civil rights movement as succeeding through restrained and moderate leaders, but condemn the rioting and the burning of cities by African Americans. Those who condemn that I think do so naively. For they are not taking into account the exact things which made the American Republic both free and powerful.

      目标片段

      有人说咱们这个美国大学学术自由,如今正在受到了严重的威胁,这个声音就是这个声音。但其实仔细细数起来,学术自由,它的历史也只是短短的100年而已。今天在美国社会,我相信在中国也是一样,会有很多人把学术自由和言论自由混淆一谈。我来谈一谈这个这两个事情。其实是完全不一样的。其实这个也是今天中午跟我博导吃饭的内容啊,咱们就说我中午刚刚吃完,晚上就来录他跟我说的话,