来源节目
证据摘要
证据等级部分相似
接受窗口3
覆盖率1.9%(3 / 159 段)
查看算法层细节
相似度中位数0.697
最高相似度0.719
时间信息exact / exact
如何阅读先选来源,再选片段比较:上方为目标,下方为来源灰色方块:目标片段彩色方块:来源片段(颜色对应来源播客)实线:对齐片段对(颜色对应来源)线条透明度随相似度变化;最不透明的线条表示最强匹配

最高相似度示例 · 非人工确认结果

目标片段所以在我广泛阅读了19世纪欧洲小说之后,我觉得任何人都会得出一个跟我差不多的总体的印象,那就是法国小说跟同时期其他国家所有小说相比,哪怕是这些其他国家最尖锐,最含有社会批判性的小说。法国小说跟他们相比,都有一种其他国家文学家望尘莫及的特质。这种特质我管它叫做缺德,我们可以用另外一个词来描绘了。你可以说法国小说具有望尘莫及的现代性,或者说法国小说在文学性这种文明发展上,一记绝成这种个人体验,也不是我一个人的想法了。
来源片段And how is it different from more, you know, realist modes that we might expect? Right. Yeah. So there's an interesting thing he says in an essay that he writes about French fiction, actually, when he says that there are two kinds of novels. There's one in which characters are abstractions or embodied classifications. And the implied or embodied opinions are the main matter of the work. And then there's the other kind where characters are individuals in the events of the, you know, what you're interested in, and opinions are just kind of incidental there. So he's describing in that second category, you know, kind of realist, character driven,

相似度 0.719 · Close Readings · Novel Approaches: 'Crotchet Castle' by Thomas Love Peacock · 目标 5:44–6:15 · 来源 14:26–15:03

查看片段位置
2 个展示片段 · 共 3 个展示片段(含上方示例)— 点击展开
  1. S1:2 个窗口回退
    1. S1来源 17:28–18:07目标 13:43–14:160.687

      来源片段

      come up with what looks to us coming from a different kind of novelistic tradition as quite alien. And as yes, again, as Tom said, that there's a kind of rejection of interiority as the thing that you go to fiction for. And I think this is one reason why he didn't want these works to be called novels. He didn't think of these works as an exploration of interior character, even though there are all sorts of moments of lyrical, rhapsodic, unromantic identification of one character with another. That's not really what this is about. So in terms of predecessors and influences, I mean, I guess, among the clearest ones are classical forms, including the Socratic dialogue, the kind

      目标片段

      对于俄国人来说,民族意识的觉醒,伴随着东正教的宗教性。所以说一方面你在俄国小说中可以看到这种极度现代的法国小说的影子。另外一方面你也能够看到一种和俄罗斯民族性捆绑在一起的东正教前程,这是俄国文学特有的现象。所以今天我们就直接把他一屁股踹出我的讨论范围。在这个当然在这个杂交期间会有一些意外。比如说托尔斯泰的战争与和平就是一部例外。它的例外在于托尔斯泰的战争与和平和他自己写的之后写的所有小说也不一样。战争与和平是一本贵族小说,它的历史观、哲学观并不现代托尔斯泰后来写出了很多就是受到法国小说影响的现代小说。

    2. S1来源 20:58–21:34目标 36:14–36:460.697

      来源片段

      Yes, I mean, he repudiates interiority in favour of a testing of ideas or a thought about systems or a kind of question about politics. And that repudiation of interiority is partly because he doesn't want to write novels, but it's also partly the experience of having been friends with Shelley and seeing what happened to Shelley's reputation after his death. Peacock hates biography and autobiography and the whole trend for that kind of writing. But anyway, I'll park that for now. Yeah, I mean, Socratic dialogue, I think, is not such a useful category as menope and satir,

      目标片段

      你不能像我们这样单纯的享受文学吗?你不能从文学的角度享受文学吗?我阅读文学的时候,从来不会去思考政治。我只是在单纯的感受这个小说作为一个艺术作品,给我个人带来的感受。文学爱好者会说,政治学者能不能不要手里拿这个锤子,看什么都像是个钉子。你用政治视角来解读文学是在玷污文学的文学性,因为所有人都有自己的取向。我认为这期播客的全部内容,我对于法国小说背后的政治思想背景的讨论已经正面的回答了这一批评现代小说作为一种文学体裁,