最高相似度示例 · 非人工确认结果
目标片段随着我们变得越来越平等，越来越平等的渺小，越来越依赖舆论的力量共享的常识越来越少，搞笑的可能性也变得越来越小。我觉得这其中的社会原因要远大于政治结构或者说政体的原因，从我的角度来看，坚持搞笑的人，我对于每一个时代坚持搞笑的人都存在着一种温情。我觉得他们首先得是敏感的，观察者对社会现象要进行一定程度上的反思。所以你在网上不会听到我说任何一个搞笑人的坏话，哪怕我觉得他们不搞笑。我觉得在舆论蠢蠢欲动的铁拳之下，还有一些试图拿着一根羽毛去挠别人。
来源片段and jokes about politicians aren't necessarily satire. You know, Tom Sharp, I thought, I think, wrote satire. But no one would no one would include him in a in a sort of satirical lineage now. They would talk about, have I got news for you as satire? And I don't think it is. I think it's a topical news program and topical news comedy program. I don't think it's satirical, because it does it does it prick at our underlying assumptions? Does it say, is it saying you get the politicians you deserve? Or is it the part of the process of delivering us the politicians we deserve, which I think is what Jonathan means. I think I think you know, I think what he means is there's
查看片段位置
3 个展示片段 · 共 4 个展示片段（含上方示例）— 点击展开
S1：3 个窗口回退
来源片段
absolutely strikes hard at the way history certainly was taught. And I don't think it's taught like that anymore, you know, there's primary sources now and all that sort of stuff that my daughters have bothered themselves with. But we, growing up with that book and that parodied outlook and seeing that, you know, that after all, for historians, history is a playpen that they lob toys at each other in. Why can't it be for everyone else? And least of all, humorists? Yeah, I remember the wave of egg kings. That's how the Dark Ages were summed up.
目标片段
还有一个由智慧的马类统治的国家旅游的历险记。但是实际上这本书中充斥的都是作者。对于当时英国社会最敏感话题的讥讽殖民主义英国的宗教、英国国王、英国风气贵族的虚伪。当时这些信奉现代科学的科学家以及英国的小市民，我觉得我们我现在在网上经常看到有人抱怨说脱口秀喜剧怎么过于低俗，充满了屎尿屁。每次看到这种评价，我都觉得很搞笑。
来源片段
in the ether and disappears and is momentary. And so it's very hard to pin down actually what making people laugh when the wipers and let's dig into that question for a second about taste and what's appropriate. So because I mean, these are questions, we'll get cancelled, we need to be careful. These are questions not just for, for comics, they're questions for historians or writers or anybody engaging with the human experience in any way. So let's take the super controversial subject of the moment slavery. Could you imagine
目标片段
比如说他们你不能够在肆无忌惮的开违背工序良俗的玩笑，使尿屁玩笑也得有所收敛，一切都似乎变得更加狭窄，受众的民主化，受众的平等化。在我的观察中带来的似乎就是标题里的这个问题，搞笑变得越来越难，这是为什么？所以在花了15分钟描绘清楚这个现象之后，我想要在接下来的播客中有关搞笑，为什么会在现代社会变得越来越难？搞笑人为什么会越来越如履薄冰，以及他们被骂被封杀，被抵制的几率，为什么会变得越来越大？
来源片段
there's artificials, who are people who pretend to have some sort of disability. And it's the, it's the ones who get their heads chopped off are the artificials, because in the end, they have no defense before God, or their king, or their patron. Because that, that if they speak out of line, everyone goes, well, we know perfectly well, you're not innocent, you're putting it on. This is your, this is your act. And they're the guys who get into trouble. Whereas the innocents tend not to, you know, you look at Will, Will Summer, who was Henry the Eighth's fool. He's also then, he's then in the court of Edward VI, he goes through to Queen Mary's
目标片段
弱者是经不起嘲讽的。强者，被嘲讽的时候，他最不会出现的情绪就是恼羞承诺。因为他们最害怕被自己的同类跟自己同一个阶级的人，认为他们没有风度。我们去看为什么17世纪的莫里埃尔这个剧作家能够在法国皇宫对着贵族贴脸，开大嘲笑，这个朝廷里的权臣都是溜须拍马的智障。一方面是当时这些被嘲笑被攻击的对象，他们本质上并不在乎被人拿来当做笑柄。