最高相似度示例 · 非人工确认结果
目标片段但是我们没有办法说哪一种哪一种对于自由的向往，常识中对于自由的向往，或者是反常识的对于自由的向往，它就是理性的，就是真正的对于自由的向往。所以我观察到的在我们社会中，很多有关自由的讨论，并不是一小撮渴望自由的人，在反抗一大撮不渴望自由的人。我们我看到的关于自由的讨论是很多不同的对于自由的理解之间的冲撞。但是我觉得我们会习惯的把跟我们理解不同的人想象成不自由的人，或者说不渴望自由的人。
来源片段And so in the free will debate, there is usually some response of that nature from the free will libertarians or from the compatibilists. So the free will libertarians are the people who basically think the will is the uncaused cause. I should say the compatibilists are far more common these days, and to briefly explain who they are, the compatibilists are people who argue that free will and determinism can coexist. And this is usually based, you know, when you probe a little bit on some variation of Hitchens' assessment, or the general sentiment of like, don't careism, that even though the evidence or the arguments against freedom of the will might seem strong,
查看片段位置
3 个展示片段 · 共 4 个展示片段（含上方示例）— 点击展开
S1：3 个窗口回退
来源片段
I might have been reading something about it that day but we were just sort of talking about philosophy and things of that nature. I brought up Free Will and my friend said, I don't have a position. I don't really care about the Free Will debate. And when I asked him why he repeated something that I've heard all too often, which is it doesn't matter. People are going to believe whatever they want to believe so the logic goes. So, you know, in absentia of any compelling evidence in one direction or another, people are going to take the position that matches with their temperament.
目标片段
我们已经知道了现实能够阻碍人们对于自由的向往，我们不讨论能不能的问题，我们来讨论什么事情，应该阻碍你对自由的向往，我会提出三个观点，欢迎大家在评论区或者是读者来信中提出你对我这个反思的想法。在这之前我还想说的是，有很多年轻人会抱怨说，我们最缺乏自由教育，说他们最渴望的就是自由教育。但是每一次我觉得我比如说我提出对于自由的反思和批评的时候，每一次都会收到这样的反馈。
来源片段
So this is not a real argument being made. It's the claim that we shouldn't even have the argument. I remember Hitchens himself argued in a debate on the topic of reparations. He said that whenever your opponent takes it upon himself to explain why you shouldn't even have the argument, that should get your attention, because it's something they don't want to touch. They know the evidence isn't there. This isn't a rationally held position and it's not going to stand up to scrutiny. And so in the free will debate, there is usually some response of that nature from the free will libertarians or from the compatibilists.
目标片段
所以只有这样，当它被更加紧迫的新冒出来的全新议程挑战的时候，它才能够找到一个除了道德紧迫感之外的理由说，我们应该维护的这个东西是有道理的，因为它就应该是这样的。这是一个比较委婉的。在105期评论区指责，我不应该在中文语境中讨论第一哀历史渊源的这些同学的回应。这也是预先对于本期听众中可能会指责我说，你在一个本来就缺乏自由的地方讨论，对于自由的向往，
来源片段
I'm just pointing out that if you're going to say that we can't get rid of free will because of some advantage it gives to believe in it, you leave yourself open to that counter argument. Okay, what if it gives greater advantage to get rid of it? And is that seriously what the argument should be about? What the nature of our noble lies should be? Is that really like a Petersonian style argument? But in any case, Peterson says, no, you simply have to go on believing in free will, even if it's not true.
目标片段
因为你没有做出任何选择，所以这是我想说的第二点，能否选择也可以阻挡你对于自由的向往。如果你没有选择的能力，那你没有办法拥有真正的自由。第三点最后一点我想说的是，对于现实世界的接受，应该阻挡你对自由的向往。哇，我已经可以想象说舒适这句话之后会有什么反驳的声音了。跟上一期播客完全相反的态度说，我上一期播客是一个理想主义者。这一期播客又说我是站在现实主义态度之上，对于理想主义的抨击。所以说这个现实主义理想主义的框架没有什么帮助我们思考的意义。