来源节目
证据摘要
证据等级部分相似
接受窗口1
覆盖率3.4%(1 / 29 段)
查看算法层细节
相似度中位数0.655
最高相似度0.655
时间信息exact / exact
如何阅读先选来源,再选片段比较:上方为目标,下方为来源灰色方块:目标片段彩色方块:来源片段(颜色对应来源播客)实线:对齐片段对(颜色对应来源)线条透明度随相似度变化;最不透明的线条表示最强匹配

最高相似度示例 · 非人工确认结果

目标片段我老公和他的朋友那天晚上是争论的,不可开交。对这个问题我暂时没有我自己的答案。那但是从那晚之后,我就一直有这个想法,播客有没有可能是公共哲学的一种呢?如果是的话,那我自己做一个播客是否可以帮我回答这个问题,就是在大庭广众下或深或浅、或快或慢的思考,有没有可能给别人带来某种帮助,以至于给自己带来一些启蒙呢?
来源片段You know, you can say people are going to do this in consultation with their kids, but in reality, you've just given some people two votes or even three or four votes and I'm still stuck with one. How on earth is this universal suffrage? So there's a lot of objections to it. But I think it's a really interesting idea. And I think it's something that I would be open to having a discussion about. So that's my answer to that. Thank you for listening to the Political Philosophy podcast. If you're finding these conversations valuable, please do share them on your own social media or tag friends who you think would like it.

相似度 0.655 · Political Philosophy · ASK ME ANYTHING Q&A with the host · 目标 5:29–6:00 · 来源 50:43–51:17

查看片段位置